Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.
Advertisement
PubMed Google Scholar
Technology giants such as Meta and Microsoft are describing their artificial intelligence (AI) models as ‘open source’ while failing to disclose important information about the underlying technology, say researchers who analysed a host of popular chatbot models.
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02012-5
Correction 19 June 2024: An earlier version of this article contained an error in the table. This has now been corrected.
Liesenfeld, A. & Dingemanse, M. In FAccT ’24: Proc. 2024 ACM Conf. on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 1774–1787 (ACM, 2024).
Download references
Reprints and permissions
What the EU’s tough AI law means for research and ChatGPT
Open-source AI chatbots are booming — what does this mean for researchers?
Generative AI could revolutionize health care — but not if control is ceded to big tech
Open-source language AI challenges big tech’s models
Why open-source generative AI models are an ethical way forward for science
Can we open the black box of AI?
AlphaFold3 — why did Nature publish it without its code?
Expanding the human proteome with microproteins and peptideins
Article
A guide to the Nature Index
Nature Index
Dozens of AI disease-prediction models were trained on dubious data
News
AI can design viruses, toxins and other bioweapons. How worried should we be?
News Feature
How to vibe code in science: early adopters share their tips
News Feature
AI bills can be as big as a postdoc salary. Is the cost worth it?
News
Can AI tools assess coding assignments?
Career Column
Street sellers and private physicians fuel antibiotic overuse
Outlook
Economic reform can save antibiotic innovation
Outlook
CIB invites distinguished Strategic Scientist, Outstanding Young Investigator, and Postdoctoral Research Fellow.
Chengdu, Sichuan (CN)
Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
Join HZAU's global faculty team to advance research with competitive benefits.
Wuhan, Hubei (CN)
Huazhong Agricultural University (HZAU)
Postdoctoral Fellow focus on ferroic smart materials: shape-memory alloys, piezoelectric ceramics, and magnetostrictive materials, etc
Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN)
Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)
PI & Associate Professor class focus on innovative research about ferroic smart materials or technology transfer
Ningbo, Zhejiang (CN)
Center for Advanced Smart Materials (CASM), Yongjiang Laboratory (Y-Lab)
The Scientific Editor plays a critical role in ensuring a high‑quality, efficient, and integrity‑driven peer review process.
London – Hybrid working model
Springer Nature Ltd
What the EU’s tough AI law means for research and ChatGPT
Open-source AI chatbots are booming — what does this mean for researchers?
Generative AI could revolutionize health care — but not if control is ceded to big tech
Open-source language AI challenges big tech’s models
Why open-source generative AI models are an ethical way forward for science
Can we open the black box of AI?
AlphaFold3 — why did Nature publish it without its code?
An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.
Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.
Nature (Nature)
ISSN 1476-4687 (online)
ISSN 0028-0836 (print)
© 2026 Springer Nature Limited